Archive for the ‘General’ Category

12
Jun

Keep your favorite restaurant open

   Posted by: rew   in Business, General

[I actually drafted this post about a week ago, when Mama Fu's was still open; I just found out this week that they've closed down. I don't think that this post would have made much difference for them by itself; it was likely too late. But still, I shouldn't have waited. I'm telling you, "too late" can sneak up on you in a hurry. If there's a place you like, don't wait around.]

The other day at Mama Fu’s, I talked to one of the owners for a few minutes while she folded napkins and I ate Honey Glazed Chicken.

She said things were rough, though they had picked up a little in the last few days. The Bridge Street opening has hurt them badly. Mama Fu\'s She said it has always been brutal, but now it’s “doubly brutal.” I feel really bad for her, because I know what it’s like. I’ve been there, but I didn’t know what to say.

The truth is I hadn’t eaten at Mama Fu’s in a couple of months. I like the place; no, I love the place. I talk to people about how I like Mama Fu’s, and take people there. I can’t think of anywhere else in Huntsville that I enjoy as much for the price as Mama Fu’s. There are places I prefer to eat, but they all cost more. It’s convenient for me; I drive by it all the time. But for various reasons I just hadn’t made it there.

I wanted to tell her, “Hang in there, it will get better,” but I don’t know if it will or not. I wanted to say something to encourage her, but it occurred to me that it won’t help. What she needs, as the owner, is not encouragement; she needs customers.

Unless you’ve owned a retail establishment, you may not understand that the way to express appreciation for it is to go there and spend money as often as possible, and encourage your friends to do the same. Everything else - compliments, encouragement, smiles - is just a packet of sweetener for whatever the owner is having to drink.

My wife and I had a lovely bookstore and coffee shop a few years ago. It was a fantastic place - I still miss it to this day - but it was never profitable, not for a month, hardly ever for even a week. We stuck it out for 3 years before finally shutting it down.

When we closed the store, we had people come by in tears. They were so upset, but yet they were often people we hadn’t seen in weeks. We had people going on about how much they missed us, how much they’d loved us, who came in once a month and hardly spent anything. They couldn’t imagine why we would close: “It was such a lovely place, and it was always so busy!” Well, it wasn’t busy enough, and too many people just came there to mill around and talk, and didn’t buy anything. If half the people that said they loved it had supported it the way they say they loved it, we wouldn’t have had to close.

I don’t say this to whine, because by now I know it’s probably good that we did close. But I learned this then, and had forgotten it. Mama Fu’s has reminded me, and I’m sharing it with you: it won’t do you much good to be standing outside the shuttered front door saying, “I loved this place! Oh, my goodness! Why did they go out of business?” Usually, the store went out of business because I, and people like me, didn’t spend enough money there. We got bored, we got distracted, we didn’t think about it, and we didn’t patronize them enough.

It’s hard to be in business, and it’s especially hard to be in a food business. It’s a lot like the music business, but without the glamour and riches. it’s vicious and cut-throat, expensive and difficult, capricious and terrible, and almost everyone fails at it sooner or later.

So here is a warning to you: if there is a place that you like to eat and it’s not a big successful money-printing chain like McDonald’s (they’re like roaches, you can’t kill them) - if it’s an independent place that you like, go there as often as you can.

But what’s more important, urge other people to go there. Sell for them. Not in an annoying-salesman way, but by telling people, “I went there, it was great, you have to go try it.” And then ask them, “Have you gone? Have you had the mushu pork? Have you had the Philly cheese-steak? Did you try that chicken sandwich I told you about?” Grab them by the collar and say, “Oh, let’s go there for lunch!” Go spend money and encourage other people to go and spend money. That’s how you support places you like, and that’s how you keep them in business.

You will be surprised how much difference a single person shopping or eating at your place regularly can make to a small store.

Zemanta Pixie

When Apple introduced the new iPhone 3G on Monday, they changed more than the hardware. They changed their deal with AT&T, giving up the cut of monthly revenue from iPhone users. Instead, AT&T will “buy” iPhones from Apple, and then sell them at a lower price to customers to get them into a 2-year contract, and (hopefully) hooked.

This is, after all, how it’s usually done in cellular-land. But Apple had gotten a lot of press for their “game-changing” deal with AT&T (and AT&T had gotten a lot of criticism). So did AT&T suddenly gain the upper hand? Did they outsmart El Jobso? Did Apple stumble here?

Hardly.

According to this Marketwatch piece, the iPhone 3G subsidies are expected to cost AT&T around $1 billion this year.

The new entry price point for the 3G iPhone - $199 - is killer, and is going to move a lot of the devices to customers who’d been unable or unwilling to part with $399 or higher before. And a lot of that difference is coming out of AT&T’s pockets. AT&T, for their part, has a plan here; cellular companies have this game worked out pretty well, having subsidized cell phones nearly since their introduction in order to lock-in long-term revenue.

But back to the original question: was Apple willing to give up their monthly cut of all those locked-in customers just to move more hardware? Did they give up on trying to carve out a recurring revenue stream from their ground-breaking phone?

No, they just moved on to the next phase of their plan.

The key is the App Store. Apple has created a new market for software applications - the iPhone - and has made itself the single retail outlet for selling software into that environment. There are some exceptions - you can deploy apps within your own organization, or to a hundred or so iPhones ‘ad hoc’ - but for pretty much everyone else, if you develop an iPhone app, you’re going to sell it through Apple’s App Store or not at all. And there are going to be a lot of iPhone apps sold.

Steve Jobs spent twice as long during his keynote talking about the App Store, and applications available for the iPhone, as about the new iPhone itself. Including the enterprise elements and the SDK, it was almost 4 times as long. Clearly, this is a big deal to Apple.

Having unleashed the iPhone as a target platform for 3rd-party developers, and then set themselves up to take a cut of every application sold for it, Apple wants as many iPhones in the field as possible. So they’re letting AT&T keep all the monthly revenue in exchange for subsidizing the rollout of the new iPhones to millions of new subscribers (I predict they easily beat their 10-million-iPhone target for 2008), all of whom will be hungry for new apps for their new toys.

And Apple stands to profit from every single one.

Skate to where the puck is going to be,” indeed.

Update:Reuters reports that “some estimates” put the impact of the lost monthly revenue from AT&T at 3c/share.

But Piper Jaffray’s Gene Munster projects hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue for the Apple Store, which would dwarf the lost revenue from AT&T, even by his “conservative” estimates.

13
Apr

Creating the desire to do by just starting

   Posted by: rew   in General

My friend Keith told me something that’s helped him write more lately:

[...]for the past few days I’ve really tried to write at least 15 minutes every day. Once I get started, I just crank it out. [...] In the past month I’ve thought about it and opened Marsedit over and over, looked over my drafts, and not wanted to write on any particular one, so I didn’t that day. But when I have to do 15 minutes, I find that I can pick any of my drafts, and when I force the words out, suddenly I do want to write on that topic. [Emphasis mine - rew]

The idea that simply committing beforehand to write for X minutes creates the desire to write more seems counterintuitive (to me, anyway). Yet there are certainly a lot of good writers who say that’s the secret (or the main part of it). Yet it seems so hard, if you’re not doing it right then to believe that it could be so simple. I guess it’s because, while simple, it’s not easy. It’s doubly pernicious because the whole reason I can’t seem to get started is that I don’t want to right now. The fact that if I’d get started, then I’d want to is sort of beside the point.

There are other things besides writing that work that way for me. For instance, some days I really, really don’t want to work out. Yet even on those days, the moment after I start, I no longer want to quit until I’ve done every single rep of every single exercise. It’s not some great expenditure of will power at that point; finishing every step is what I want to do. The critical moments all are in the lead-up to the one where I actually begin.

Right up to very first step on the stepper or first lift, my brain is all abuzz with excellent reasons this would be a good day to skip it.

Now there’s no reason at all why the first rep of the first exercise should change my state of mind. If it was a good day to skip before, it should be a good day to skip after the first step. I’m not jacked up on endorphins, I’m not tired or sweating yet, not pumped up or let down or anything. Yet the moment I’ve started, I no longer want to quit. To get finished, sure, but not to quit.

Now, it’s possible that’s deeply-ingrained training from way back in some day when I had coaches who beat that into my head. If so, I’m grateful (again) for having had people teach me that. But I think it may be something more fundamentally human and psychological. I don’t think I’m alone in it, and I don’t think it’s purely the outcome of someone yelling at me regularly not to quit many years ago. I dunno.

The thing that seems to change is whether it’s hard to do something. Keith said that once he gets started writing, the desire to keep writing follows on its own. I find the same thing with my workout. The fact that I don’t want to right now doesn’t mean that I won’t want to once I get started.

The trick seems to be training my rational mind enough to force my emotional mind to just have a little faith that once I start, I’ll be doing what I want to do if I’ll just dive in.

17
Mar

There’s always something new

   Posted by: rew   in General, Life, Tech

Mack Collier’s Are You Curious was uncannily timely for me. I’ve been thinking a good bit lately about fear and new trends and the pace of technology.

It feels like things move so fast that there’s simply not time to take a week, or a month, or a year, off. We worry that we’ll get left behind if we slack off for a bit, that technology will move on and we’ll never catch up.

Even if we’re trying to keep up it can feel like things are moving ahead faster than we can move ourselves. But it’s not true; there’s always room for good work and good observations.

Pick something and start talking about it. Say something stupid: it’s okay. You’ll find out more by getting involved in the conversation (even by being clueless) than by sitting on the sidelines wondering if you know enough to contribute anything.

Talk to people, learn stuff, get on board and move. You can always catch up, you can always contribute. You just can’t sit there on your butt, paralyzed by fear of irrelevance, and let the world move away from you and leave you behind. If you want to do the work, there’s always something new that you can become an expert in that no one else has done before and so no else has known before.

There’s always a new trend, there’s always a new revolution around the corner in technology or business. There’s never one last chance.

After the bubble burst in 2000, there were a lot of gloomy voices acting like that was the end. Technology was gonna be a commodity. The land grab was over, the dot com rush was finished, blah, blah, blah. There was a great malaise for a few years for a lot of people who didn’t know what to do.

Of course, some people just kept on working. Too young or too dumb or too focused on their work or plans or dreams to be put off, they were too busy creating interesting things to bother with joining the Malaise.

So they created the current revolution, and sure enough, a lot like before, the money and buzz have returned. This one will crash too, eventually, but there will be another one after that.

So don’t sweat it. It’s OK to miss out on things, especially if you’re doing other worthwhile things with your life. There will be another exciting train along shortly to hop aboard. In fact, one’s usually at the station just waiting for another clever passenger.

Quoting a book review by J. Peter Pham in National Review, 31 Dec 2005:

Historian Robert Conquest recently pondered why so many of his fellow scholars had been for so long incapable of grasping the true nature of the Soviet regime. He concluded by blaming “a clerisy that has hardly heard of opinions other than those appearing to be…the acceptable expression of concern for humanity” and that has demonstrated “a strong tendency to silence those who disagree with one or another of the accepted beliefs.”

Can you think of an issue about which people pretend that there exists no “other” side, or that anyone who says, “Wait, I don’t think that’s what’s happening here, this evidence here suggests otherwise,” is a lunatic, or out to destroy humanity, the world, decency, puppies?

It’s so easy to slide into this kind of closed-mindedness. I believe what I believe, and I think I have good reasons for it. I enjoy finding other people who seem intelligent and well-spoken who share that belief. But from there it’s only a lazy little slip over into “ALL people who are intelligent and well-spoken WILL share this belief; everyone else is an evil slug.”

I suspect many readers not only thought of a great example of such narrow-minded idea bigots, but also assume that most smart, “good”, and well-informed people would agree.

So, for instance, if you believe “Bush lied, kids died” is an accurate and pithy explanation of the current conflict in and over Iraq, you thought “stupid/evil neocon warmongers”. If, on the other hand, you think “Global warming is a Commie plot”, you thought “stupid/evil Gore-cult worshipers”.

But the point I’m trying to make here is that if I (or you) begin to think that nobody in their right mind could disagree with my example “clerisy of narrow minds”, then I’ve slipped into the same mindset, thus joining one myself.

p.s. - I know that I’m a card-carrying member of about 14 different “clerisies” myself. But I’m working on escaping. Are you?

5
Mar

Fast Company, new accounts, and reachability

   Posted by: rew   in General, Tech

While looking for this Fast Company article, I ran across someone named ‘Miro Slodki’ asking for a link to this very article. Since I had the link handy, I pasted it into the ‘Comment’ field and hit ‘Submit’, Can\'t make me! and was sent to FC’s “Here, create an account and tell us lots about yourself, agree to our ToS, etc.”

I just wanted answer Miro’s question. So I googled ‘Miro Slodki’ and found his blog. “A-ha!” I thought. “I’ll just zip over and email him directly, and in less time than it would take to fill out FC’s ‘new user’ form. Take that, Fast Company!”

Only…I couldn’t find an email link. Now stubbornly in pursuit of my prey, I spent 5 minutes wandering around the site, even visiting his LinkedIn profile, only to by stymied. Nowhere on the site (that I could find) was there any way to just contact Miro directly (even via a web form), other than posting comments on actual posts.

I even found that Miro is looking for interesting work:

PS. At the moment I find myself seeking new challenges and contracting assignments. I would appreciate if you could extend a kind word on my behalf and send the referrals my way.

But how could I do that if I can’t find how to contact him?

I searched for a while, but Google and I couldn’t find him. I found other places that Miro had joined and commented, all of which jealously guarded any way to contact him directly. So eventually I gave up. We’ll see if, in an amusing irony, the linkback to his blog that Wordpress will auto-generate will draw him here to see the link he’d asked for a week or so ago.

Hey, I’m not picking on Miro, by any means. I don’t even know him (though I know him better than I did 20 minutes ago, that’s for sure). I’m just pointing out what I think are two serious problems companies and people share when trying to use the web to achieve their goals:

  • Trying to enforce behavior on people that I have no relationship with, and to whom I offer no benefit. I wasn’t trying to get something from Fast Company; I was trying to help out one of their readers, on their site, by linking to one of their articles.
  • Seeking visibility and opportunity without giving it a way to knock. I know spam is a problem, but being permanently incommunicado is worse. You don’t have to go as far as Scoble. But if you want contact, you have to throw me a bone.
27
Feb

WFB, RIP

   Posted by: rew   in General, Politics

I wish I could see what sort of an obit he’d have written about a guy like him. But alas, there was only one. RIP.

Kids, if you’re standing in what our British cousins might call a “queue” - one of those setups where you’re waiting your turn in a more-or-less ordered straggling pile of people ahead of you - you are not “on line” or “online”. You are “in line”, as in “in line with the people ahead of you” or “in a line at the ticket counter”. You may be “online”, for instance, if you brought your iPhone, but you’re not standing “online”.

When it’s your turn, you are not “next on line”; you are “next in line”. It doesn’t matter that (1) all your friends say it this way, (2) you’ve never heard of “in line”, (3) you don’t get what the difference is, or (4) you don’t care. It’s still wrong, and you’re wrong if you talk that way.

One day, long ages hence, the language may have become so permanently mutilated that “online” will be the correct way to say “waiting in a queue arranged linearly”. But that day is not today, nor will it be tomorrow, and if I have anything to say about it, will be never.

I wonder sometimes where this abomination comes from. I don’t know, really, but I have a couple of guesses which do not exclude one another. The correct term — “in line”, in case you forgot — comes from the simple fact that you are, in fact, in a line with the people in front of and behind you. Even if that line curves or turns back (as around crowd-control barriers at an airport), it’s still a continuous line from front to back. It’s not a metaphorical line, it’s a real one, made up of people.

Now, to say that you’re “on line”, assuming that it’s not just completely stupid (let’s don’t rule that out, but perhaps there’s a quasi-sensible origin somewhere), must have originally meant something to the first bonehead to use the phrase to mean “standing in a line”. My current theories are these:

  1. In some elementary schools, I have seen actual lines painted along corridors or in lunchrooms, presumably to give the little blighters a physical reference for what standing “in line” might look like. In their case, they would actually be “on line” when standing “in line”, and I suspect that careless or worn-out teachers quickly abandoned the pretext of a semantic difference, and just took to screeching, “Billy, get back on line before I put you in double-secret timeout for another 15 seconds!”
  2. Some person whose grasp of the art of speech was only the barest, whilst grasping for the complicated phrase “in line” to indicate that they were currently “in a line”, stumbled upon the phrase “on line”, and since it had in their confused mental state a vaguely good association (after all, the cool kids are all online these days), they chose it as the best they could do and just went with it.
  3. Others, either linguistically careless or semantically clueless, heard this usage and managed to go so far as to invent a metaphoric line on the floor on which all of the people “in line” were standing, thus making the “on line” a harmless, perhaps even clever, variation. Seeking novelty over clarity, or just not caring enough to say anything right in the first place, they, too, just went with it.

Hence, perhaps, is the language further debased.

I welcome other theories, or better yet, reasonably well-supported evidence, indicating how “on line” came to muscle out its correct cousin and perch now insolently atop the pile of juvenile misolinguism.

15
Jan

Waiting for the new koolaid flavor

   Posted by: rew   in General

It’s been really interesting this year seeing how various sites handle liveblogging (or tweeting) Steve Jobs’ Macworld keynote. Twitter, naturally, handled it by going down for a while. :) What has surprised me so far is how badly Engadget’s liveblogging page has performed. Not only did Ars Technica’s equivalent consistently load faster, it had better updates, faster. C’mon, Engadget! But then, both of them were stomped flat by the excellent, auto-updating goodness of Mac Rumors Live (tip to @brainopera, to which I have switched and closed the other two tabs by halfway through.

It ain’t over yet; so far everything’s been pretty good, and I think the new Apple TV 2 is going to be big. I know the chances of us buying a big ol’ flat-screen HD box just went up a good bit. But we’re all waiting for the “one more thing”.

26
Dec

Managing social info streams: a modest request

   Posted by: rew   in General, Tech

Chris Brogan and Clarence Smith Jr. (am I supposed to just say “@chrisbrogan and @dykc” to appear more ‘linked-in’ and whatnot?) just posted a collaborative piece about managing the (many, many) streams of information from sources like Twitter (or any aggregator, like Google Reader, I’d add).

My immediate thought is that this is a perfect task for adding intelligence on the client side. For instance, I would love to have more options in Twitterific for controlling the incoming tweetstream.

With a ‘pause’ feature, if @InterestingDude is temporary at ReallyBoringConfFest07, and will be until Thursday, I’d love to be able to put him on “pause” until then, so that I don’t see all his excited tweets about impromptu hallway meetings with ReallyBoringPeople and ReallyBoringProjects.

But I don’t want to quit following @InterestingDude permanently; I’ve just lost interest for the next few days. I don’t want to have to remember to re-follow him, either; I just want to skip the next couple of days (or hours or whatever) of tweets from him.

The problem Chris and Clarence are examining is how to get more of the info that’s interesting and less of what’s not, when the “interestingness” isn’t always determined by the person or the topic. The ability to follow tweets or blog posts by “interesting people” is a start, but only a very primitive one. There are lots of fascinating people doing fascinating work, but who have hobbies that bore me to tears (and vice versa). There are a very few people who write so well that it hardly matters what they’re doing, I just enjoy reading their writing. And there are many, many people who normally would not be of interest to me at all, except when they happen to have seen/talked to/read/bought/tripped over the very piece of information which is extremely relevant to something I’m working on or discussing with other people.

Perhaps I should just quote Chris and Clarence a bit:

The problem arises when the people you follow are initiating and participating in conversations that you do not find interesting at all. [...] Said another way: I might like YOU, but not be into every little thing you are into. [...] How can we catch your tweets about social computing but skip the tweets about being stuck at JFK for a 3 hour delay?

It’s not that YOU should have to twitter differently, but rather, we should have a way to adjust the lens on what comes through our “interestingness” gate. And of course, this is all relative to whatever you’re interested in, who, and often times where. For instance, if we’re visiting Seattle, we might want to get MORE about the area around us than less, in case something newsworthy is happening (like avoiding a traffic jam).

They also (briefly) consider the personal/social implications of such filtering:

How do we on/off the conversational flow of people in such a way that we receive more of what’s interesting to us (again, very relative), without it signifying anything negative about a person?

This I don’t find as compelling, partly (perhaps) because so far I only have an extremely limited scope of friends (in anything resembling the traditional sense) who are Twittr/Whatevr users. But I feel pretty confident that the notion of any social implications of being filtered or un-followed (is that a word?) will adjust with the tools. As people spend enough time swimming in the flow of social network infostreams, it will become more apparent that social standing with a person is largely disconnected from how much of your socnet output they’re consuming at any given time (perhaps it will always have more to do with which parts of our output they consume than how much).

C&C continue:

Why can’t we have a system that’s partly like Flickr’s “interesting” and “favorites” system, that helps train Twitter (and other networks) to predict which conversations will matter to us? Something more than keywords. How do we apply this same thinking to the people we currently “follow?” What if Clarence loves when Chris talks about data centers, but doesn’t care about Chris’s current trip to New York City? How could we “gate-on” based on information, and then “gate-off” when the interestingness vanishes? [...] How could we build tools that turn on and off our view of someone’s Twitter stream based on things like: location, context, content?

This is where I think there’s a big ol’ gaping opportunity for an interesting next-gen aggregator. How many different ways are there to arrange the panes in a blog reader? Well, OK, there’s a zillion, but the point is, how many of them are enough better to compel me to change to them? Just like with the mail client, the things that really are going to motivate people to change en masse will be the addition of “intelligence” to make managing the burgeoning information therein easier.

The “pause” thing would be cool; but man, a client that could determine what I was interested in at the moment, and help me find “more of this and less of that”, would really pique my interest. Whether it did it by reacting to explicit actions like tagging or even rating (3 stars or 4?) tweets or people, or by implicit observation of my behavior (in the same vein as how Google Reader’s “Select by Auto” works), it would be a great step in the right direction.

Plus, you know, a pony. And an aeroplane. And a perpetual motion machine. I mean, it can’t hurt to ask, right?

6
Dec

Seasonal haiku

   Posted by: rew   in General

All-new, completely original haiku that I just now wrote, all by myself:

Dashing through the snow
In a one-horse open sleigh.
O’er the fields we go.

I wrote (from my own fertile imagination) this second stanza to this epic seasonal haiku-cycle, but I don’t think it’s as good (though the last trill is very Basho-like, and that’s a good thing):

Laughing all the way
Bells on bob-tails ring, making
Spirits bright. Oh, what fun!

6
Dec

Meta-haiku

   Posted by: rew   in General

Hey, you hear that sound?
That’s the sound of seventeen
Syllables ringing.

There’s lots more such drivel here.

27
Nov

This windmill has a ‘Mini-me’

   Posted by: rew   in General

Lara Eakins of the Tudor History podcast turned me on to the beautiful Pictures of England site. There goes the next, oh, 3 months, as I now have to browse through every…single…picture there.

Anyway, I’m currently making my way through County Buckinghamshire, and I’m struck by all the windmills. I’ve seen been looking at pictures of England for years, and picturing it in my mind (I’eve never been) from other people’s writings, and somehow I missed that there were lots of windmills. I wonder if this is true all across rural England?

I love this picture of the Quainton Windmill, in which it appears to have sprouted a little windmill on its head.

27
Nov

Writing for practice

   Posted by: rew   in General

The other day I was browsing at Coding Horror, and read this post about ‘Fear of Writing’. I had never thought of writing as something I was afraid of. I write all the time, mostly email and memos and documents at work. But those are for (mostly) private consumption. Writing for a public audience always felt like it was something that took an enormous amount of effort to do well.

So I don’t do it. I don’t post here (much). I don’t write articles. I haven’t written a book. It’s not because I don’t think (operative word here: think) that I have something to say, but because I just don’t have the time/energy/whatever to do it. But afraid? Nah, not me.

But I think Jeff’s right: writing is hard, and I am afraid of that. I’m afraid of the work, and the commitment, and most of all, I’m afraid that in the end, if I work really hard and take a lot of time and struggle with it, and pour my heart into it, it won’t be very good after all. And what is that but fear?

Well, fear sucks. But what sucks even more is letting fear keep me from doing stuff that I want to do. I like to write; I just find contexts to do it where I have ready-made excuses if it’s not very good (email, IM, forum posts using some nebulous “screen name”, etc.). It doesn’t have to be me that drooled out that random dollop of illiterate trolling. It was just, you know, a quick note, or a post that wasn’t under my name or something. No commitment, no worries. Well, that’s a bunch of crap.

Some people are really good at ferreting out their personal fears and smashing them into bits, one by one. Others of us occasionally peek in the anxiety closet where we try to keep them hidden and see if maybe today they look a little less scary.

This is one fear, however, that I can’t tolerate any more. In the past week, I’ve serendipitously read several smart people who’ve all said the same thing about it: if you want to get more comfortable (and better at) writing, you have to do it regularly. Yeah. No shortcuts there.

So herewith, a warning: my goal for the next (mumble mumble) is going to be to write something frequently. That means that you, dear (and probably only) reader had better have a high tolerance for drivel or just move along now and find someone more interesting to read.

So don’t come whining to me if you find what I write about trivial, obscure, bizarre or downright alarming. I’ll just say you were warned. In writing.

26
Sep

Don’t wait for the perfect time

   Posted by: rew   in General

I ran across this quote from the 2007-02-27 issue of Forbes last year:

“Conditions are never just right. People who delay action until all factors are favorable are the kind who do nothing.” - William Feather

29
Aug

Indefensible hats finally to be called to account

   Posted by: rew   in General

I have to direct your attention (both of you!) to the newly-formed Indefensible Hats movement. Movement leader and Flickr group founder Jon has said that he hopes to “To hold a mirror up to society and force it to ask itself some difficult questions about its headgear choices.” Lead on, Jon! Lead on.

22
Aug

Why doesn’t usps.gov resolve?

   Posted by: rew   in General

In a nod to the good old days of 2000 or so, http://usps.gov does this:

USPSOops

You gotta add the ‘www’ to the domain name. I kid you not.

27
Jun

Friends past and present

   Posted by: rew   in General

I ran into a couple of friends from high school today at lunch. It was great to see them. At first, I was just completely flummoxed. Having been summoned from my normal fog of oblivion by someone calling my name, I think I sputtered a bit. They’re married (to each other, even!), and living near Huntsville (where my office is). I hadn’t seen either of them in at least 10 years - maybe 20 (they looked younger than me, I fear).

The thing is - it just hit me how many people have passed out of my life that I’d really rather hadn’t. Good friends, casual friends, close friends, sports buddies, bosom buddies - all have come and gone. And while it seems like there should be some cataclysmic event that separates friends more or less permanently, it doesn’t seem to take much. Just lose contact, slip away, and they’re gone.

Unlike a lot of people I know - maybe most people - I had a great high school experience. Some of the best friends I’ve ever had, and some of the nicest people I’ve ever been around went to school with me (Go, ‘Dogs!). And yet, almost without exception, I’ve lost touch with them. I don’t even know where most of them live. This is not at all because I didn’t like them or want to stay friends - it’s just that all of us went to college, went to work, went on to whatever, and in 1985 it was a lot harder to maintain long-distance friends than it is now.

So I’m planning to fix that - I’m pledging right now that when I hear from friends who knew me back when, I’m going to make an effort to stay in touch. It’s not like it’s hard, it’s just something you have to take a little time to do when the opportunity presents itself.

So Sherry and Richie, here’s to you for reminding me just how many people I’ve lost, and here’s hoping you use that email address I gave you. :)

23
Jun

Making the baby Algore cry

   Posted by: rew   in General

The other day I drove by this thing, rolling into Huntsville. Of course, down here in Dixie, that’s not terribly unusual.

But what really made me laugh (and have to take a picture) was the tag:

20
Jun

Creeping back into blogging

   Posted by: rew   in General, Tech

OK, I figure that 10+ months between posts is long enough. And that my old and static and mostly useless homepage was really pointless. So I’ve moved the blog from its old location right up to the main entry point of the site, and I’m going to try (he said, wimping out in advance) to post here more regularly. After all, it’s not like there’s not plenty of stuff to talk about.