<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ereblog &#187; Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erebor.com/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=6" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erebor.com</link>
	<description>Views from the mountain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Seth Godin, Borders, and the Long Tail</title>
		<link>http://www.erebor.com/?p=141</link>
		<comments>http://www.erebor.com/?p=141#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erebor.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seth Godin wrote about Borders (referencing a post by John Moore):
It turns out that cutting inventory by 10% and facing books out (instead of just showing spines) increased their sales by 9%. This is counter to Long Tail thinking, which says that more choices and more inventory tend to increase sales.
I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth Godin <a HREF= "http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/03/do-you-have-vs.html">wrote about Borders</a> (referencing a <a HREF= "http://brandautopsy.typepad.com/brandautopsy/2008/03/borders-reducin.html">post by John Moore</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>It turns out that cutting inventory by 10% and facing books out (instead of just showing spines) increased their sales by 9%. This is counter to Long Tail thinking, which says that more choices and more inventory tend to increase sales.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what the <a HREF= "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Tail">Long Tail</a> suggests.  In fact, part of its premise means it <em>can&#8217;t</em> apply to a brick-and-mortar store, where display space is fixed (and expensive).</p>
<p>The key conditions are well-summarized in the Wikipedia entry:</p>
<blockquote><p>The key supply-side factor that determines whether a sales distribution has a Long Tail is the cost of inventory storage and distribution. Where inventory storage and distribution costs are insignificant, it becomes economically viable to sell relatively unpopular products; however, when storage and distribution costs are high, only the most popular products can be sold.</p></blockquote>
<p>Borders&#8217; action here, instead of being &#8220;against Long Tail thinking&#8221; is actually perfectly aligned with it: they realize that their sales distribution does <em>not</em> have a long tail, because their customer base is too small and their cost of additional inventory is relatively high.  So they have taken steps to increase the popularity slightly of a slightly smaller number of items.</p>
<p>Seth&#8217;s a very smart guy; it&#8217;s hard for me to tell if he&#8217;s misrepresenting the long-tail on purpose for something, or if he actually missed it on this one.  I&#8217;m guessing the former, since the real point he seemed to be making in his post was a good one.  Or am I the one missing the boat here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erebor.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=141</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kitty tries to claw Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.erebor.com/?p=46</link>
		<comments>http://www.erebor.com/?p=46#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2004 22:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kitty Kelley&#8217;s  newest attack screed claims that Pres. Bush did coke at Camp David during his father&#8217;s term, and that Laura Bush tried marijuana in her youth, according to this Mirror article.
None of this is news, of course; most of the same trash was trotted out in the 2000 election, and it didn&#8217;t fly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kitty Kelley&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0385503245/greendoorbook-20?dev-t=D128W9OSOQ3OTJ%26camp=2025%26link_code=sp1" title="The Family : The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty"> newest attack screed</a> claims that Pres. Bush did coke at Camp David during his father&#8217;s term, and that Laura Bush tried marijuana in her youth, according to <a HREF= "http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/tm_objectid=14609301&#038;method=full&#038;siteid=50143&#038;headline=bush--took-cocaine-at-camp-david--name_page.html">this Mirror article</a>.</p>
<p>None of this is <em>news</em>, of course; most of the same trash was trotted out in the 2000 election, and it didn&#8217;t fly then either. What is of more interest to me is to see how the book is treated, compared to the reception of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0895260174/greendoorbook-20?dev-t=D128W9OSOQ3OTJ%26camp=2025%26link_code=sp1" title="Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry">Unfit for Command</a>.</p>
<p>Will we hear sonorous declarations about the &#8220;seriousness of the charges&#8221; demanding a &#8220;full investigation&#8221;?  Will it be ignored for weeks by the NYT and her spawn, until they get the official &#8220;response&#8221; from the Bush campaign?</p>
<p>Will we see Bush&#8217;s lawyers frantically threatening bookstores, the publisher, TV stations, and anybody walking nearby in order to squelch its release?</p>
<p>You already know the answer.  But I still have to point it out: let the storm of hypocrisy rage anew.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> My Pet Jawa has <a href= "http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/044660.php">a great intro to Kitty Kelley</a>.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong>TotH to <a HREF= "http://www.celluloid-wisdom.com/pw/index.php?/weblog/entry/if_april_showers_bring_may_flowers_what_do_ongoing_special_forces_operation/">Protein Wisdom</a> for hooking me up with <a HREF= "http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Kitty-Kelley">more details on the Kitty</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erebor.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=46</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
